The galatians of the new testament

While text editions stress the descent of Europe from classical civilization, the face of Europe throughout most of the historical period was dominated by a individual cultural group, a powerful, culturally diverse group of peoples, the Celts. By the start of the Middle Ages, the Celts had been struck on two foreparts by two really powerful civilizations, Rome in the South, and the Germans, who were derived from Gaelic civilization, from the North. Through the period of classical Greece ( matching to the La T & A ; ecirc ; ne civilization in cardinal Europe ) to first centuries AD, most of Europe was under the shadow of this civilization which, in its diverse signifiers, still represented a reasonably incorporate civilization. This massive civilization spread from Ireland to Asia Minor ( the Galatians of the New Testament ) . The Celts even sacked Rome in 390 BC and successfully invaded and sacked several Grecian metropoliss in 280 BC. Though the Celts were preliterate during most of the classical period, the Greeks and Romans discourse them rather a spot, normally disfavorably. From this great civilization would originate the Germans ( we think ) and many of the cultural signifiers, thoughts, and values of mediaeval Europe. For non merely did mediaeval Europe expression back to the Celtic universe as a aureate age of Europe, they besides lived with societal constructions and universe positions that finally owe their beginning to the Celts every bit good as to the Romans and Greeks. The period of Gaelic laterality in Europe began to unknot in the first centuries AD, with the enlargement of Rome, the migrations of the Germans, and subsequently the inflow of an Asiatic immigrant population, the Huns. By the clip Rome fell to Gothic encroachers, the Celts had been pushed west and north, to England, Wales and Ireland and subsequently to Scotland and the northern seashore of France. The Celts are traditionally ignored in universe history text editions and class, but the Celtic manner of life, Celtic establishments, and the Celtic universe position were superimposed onto Germanic and classical civilization. The ulterior massive European civilization is greatly influenced by these early peoples. Most of what we know about Celtic life comes from Ireland-the largest and most extended of the Celtic populations, the Gauls in cardinal and western Europe, we merely know about through Roman sources-and these beginnings are unquestionably unfriendly to the Gauls. We know that the early Gaelic societies were organized around warfare-this construction would normally qualify civilizations in the procedure of migration: the Celts, the Huns, and subsequently the Germans. Although classical Greek and Roman authors considered the Celts to be violently insane, warfare was non an organized procedure of territorial conquering. Among the Celts, warfare seems to hold chiefly been a athletics, concentrating on foraies and runing. In Ireland, the establishment of the fianna involved immature, blue warriors who left the tribal country for a clip to carry on foraies and to run. When the Celts came into contact with the Romans, they changed their mode of warfare to a more organized defence agains a larger ground forces. It was these groups that the classical authors encountered and considered insane. The Gaelic method of warfare was to stand in forepart of the opposing ground forces and shriek and crush their lances and blades against their shields. They woul d so run headfirst into the opposing ground forces and screamed the full way-this frequently had the consequence of frightening the opposing soldiers who so broke into a tally ; contending a fleeing ground forces is comparatively easy work. If the opposing ground forces did non interrupt ranks, the Celts would halt short of the ground forces, return to their original place, and get down the procedure over agina. Gaelic society was hierarchal and class-based. Tribes were led by male monarchs but political organisations were unusually fictile. Harmonizing to both Roman and Irish beginnings, Celtic society was divided into three groups: a warrior nobility, an rational category that included Druids, poets, and legal experts, and everyone else.SocietySociety was tribal and kinship-based ; one ‘s cultural individuality was mostly derived from the larger tribal group, called the tuath ( â€Å" too-awth † ) in Irish ( intending â€Å" people † ) but finally based on the smallest kinship organisational unit, the kin, called the cenedl ( ke-na-dl ) , or â€Å" kindred, † in Irish. The kin provided individuality and protection-disputes between persons were ever differences between kins. Since it was the responsibility of the kin to protect persons, offenses against an person would be prosecuted against an full kin. One of the outstanding establishments among the Celts was the blood-feud in which slaying or abuses against an person would necessitate the full kin to violently exact requital. The blood-feud was in portion avoided by the establishment of professional go-betweens. At least an Ireland, a professional category of legal experts, called brithem, would intercede differences and exact reparations on the offending kin. Even though Gaelic society centered around a warrior nobility, the place of adult females was reasonably high in Gaelic society. In the earliest periods, adult females participated both in warfare and in kingship. While the ulterior Celts would follow a rigorous patriarchal theoretical account, they still have a memory of adult females leaders and warriors. Gaelic society was based about wholly on pastoralism and the elevation of cowss or sheep ; there was some agribusiness in the Celtic universe, but non much. The importance of cowss and the pastoral life created a alone establishment in Celtic, peculiarly Irish, life: the cattle-raid. The larceny of another group ‘s cows was frequently the turn outing point of a group of immature warriors ; the greatest lasting Irish myth, the T & A ; aacute ; in B & A ; oacute ; Cualingne, or â€Å" The Cattle Raid of Cooley, † centers about one such mythically-enhanced cattle-raid. There was no urbanisation of any sort among the Celts until the coming of Roman regulation ; in Ireland, urbanisation did non happen until the Danish and Norse invasions. Society was non based on trade or commercialism ; what trade took topographic point was mostly in the signifier of swap. Gaelic economic system was likely based on the economic rule of most tribal economic systems: reciprocality. In a mutual economic system, goods and other services are non exchanged for other goods, but they are given by persons to persons based on common affinity relationships and duties. ( A household economic system is typical of a mutual economy-parents and kids give each other stuff goods and services non in trade but because they are portion of a household ) . From the 19th century onwards, Celtic faith has enjoyed a captivation among modern Europeans and European-derived civilizations. In peculiar, the last few decennaries have seen a phenomenal growing non merely involvement in Celtic faith, but in spiritual patterns in portion derived from Gaelic beginnings. For all this involvement, nevertheless, we know following to nil about Celtic faith and patterns. The lone beginnings for Celtic spiritual patterns were written by Romans and Greeks, who considered the Celts little more than animate beings, and by subsequently Gaelic authors in Ireland and Wales who were composing from a Christian position. Simply put, although the Celts had a rich and permeant spiritual civilization, it has been for good lost to human memory. We can do some general remarks about Celtic faith based on the often-hostile histories of classical authors. The Celts were polytheistic ; these Gods were finally derived from more crude, Indo-germanic beginnings that gave rise to the polytheistic faiths of Greece, Persia, and India. The Romans in seeking to explicate these Gods, nevertheless, linked them with Roman Gods as did the Romanized Gauls-so we truly have no thought as to the Celtic character of these Gods and their maps. We do cognize that Gaelic Gods tended to come in 3s ; the Celtic logic of deity about ever centered on threes. This triadic logic no uncertainty had enormous significance in the interlingual rendition of Christianity into northern European cultural theoretical accounts.ReligionIt is about certain that the material universe of the Celts was suffused with deity that was both advantageous and harmful. Certain countries were considered more charged with deity than others, particularly pools, lakes and little Gr ovess, which were the sites of the cental ritual activities of Celtic life. The Celts were non-urbanized and harmonizing to Roman beginnings, Celtic ritual involved no temples or constructing structures-Celtic ritual life, so, was centered chiefly on the natural environment. Gaelic ritual life centered on a particular category, called the druides or â€Å" Druids † by the Romans, presumptively from a Gaulish word. Although much has been written about Druids and Celtic ritual pattern, we know following to nil about either. Here ‘s what we can garner. As a particular group, the Druids performed many of the maps that we would see â€Å" priestly † maps, including ritual and forfeit, but they besides included maps that we would put under â€Å" instruction † and â€Å" jurisprudence. † These rites and patterns were likely kept secret-a tradition common among early Indo-germanic peoples-which aid to explicate why the classical universe knows nil about them. The lone thing that the classical beginnings attest is that the Druids performed â€Å" barbarian † or â€Å" horrid † rites at lakes and Grovess ; there was a just sum of consensus among the Greeks and Romans that these rites involved human forfeit. This may or may non be true ; there is some grounds of human forfeit among the Celts, but it does non look to hold been a prevailing pattern. Harmonizing to Julius Caesar, who gives the longest history of Druids, the centre of Gaelic belief was the passing of psyches from one organic structure to another. From an archeological position, it is clear that the Celts believed in an after-life, for material goods are buried with the dead. The earliest Kelts who were major participants in the classical universe were the Gauls, who controlled an country widening from France to Switzerland. It was the Gauls who sacked Rome and subsequently invaded Greece ; it was besides the Gauls that migrated to Asia Minor to establish their ain, independent civilization at that place, that of the Galatians. Through invasion and migration, they spread into Spain and subsequently crossed the Alps into Italy and for good settled the country South of the Alps which the Romans so named, Cisalpine Gaul. The Gauls were a tribal and agricultural society. They were ruled by male monarchs, but single male monarchs reigned merely over little countries. Occasionally a individual powerful male monarch could derive the commitment of several male monarchs as a sort of â€Å" over-king, † but on the whole the Gauls throughout Europe were mostly an cultural continuity instead than a individual state. Cultural individuality among the early Gauls was really unstable. Cultural individuality was foremost and first based on little affinity groups, or clans-this cardinal cultural individuality frequently got collapsed into a larger individuality, that of folks. The chief political constructions, that of kingship, organized themselves around this tribal cultural individuality. For the most portion, the Gauls did non look to hold a larger cultural individuality that united the Gaulish universe into a individual cultural group-the â€Å" Gauls † as an cultural group was mostly invented by the Romans and the Greeks and applied to all the diverse folks spread across the face of northern Europe. The Gauls did hold a sense of territorial ethnicity ; the Romans and Greeks tell us that there were 16 separate territorial states of Gauls. These territorial groups were divided into a series of pagi, which were military units composed of work forces who had voluntarily united as fellow soldi ers.The GaulsThe Gauls, nevertheless, were non the original Europeans. Get downing in an country about Switzerland, the Celts spread westward and eastward displacing native Europeans in the procedure. These migrations begin around 500 BC. The Gaulish invasion of Italy in 400 was portion of this larger out-migration. The Romans, nevertheless, pushed them back by the 3rd century BC ; native Europeans in the North, nevertheless, were non so lucky. Two Gaelic folks, the Cimbri and the Teutones ( â€Å" Teuton, † an cultural for Germans, is derived from the Celtic root for â€Å" people † ) , emigrated E and settled in district in Germany. The centre of Gaelic enlargement, nevertheless, was Gaul, which lay North of the Alps in the part now within the boundary lines of France and Belgium and portion of Spain. The earliest history of the Gauls comes from Julius Caesar. In his history of his military expedition foremost into Gaul and so as far north as Britain, Caesar dexcribed the tribal and regional divisions among the Gauls, of which some seem to hold been original European populations and non Celtic at all. The Gaulish folks or districts often built munitions that served as the military and political centre of the part. These bastioned centres took their names from the larger tribe-for case, Paris took its name from the folk of Parisi and Chartres was originally named after the folk, the Carnuti, which had built it.India GlossaryGaulish society, like all of Celtic society, was stiffly divided into a category system. Similar category systems predominated among the Indians every bit good with mostly the same classs. Harmonizing to Julius Caesar, the three categories of Gaulish society were the druides, equites, and plebs, all Roman words. The Druids were the educated among the Gauls and occupied the highest societal place, merely as the Brahmin category occupied the highest societal place among the Indians. The Druids were responsible for cultural and spiritual cognition every bit good as the public presentation of rites, merely as the Brahmins in India. However vague these spiritual maps might be, the Druids were regarded as powerful over both society and the universe around them. The most powerful tool the Druids had was the power of excommunication-when a Druid excommunicated a member of a folk, it was tantamount to kicking that individual out of the society.Brahmin CaturvarnasThe British did non look in history until Julius Caesar crosses the English Channel from northern Gaul and began his failed conquering of Britain. The Romans returned in 43 AD and began a systematic conquering of the island until they reached the Pictish folks in the Scots Highlandss. Rome would abandon northern England, nevertheless, in 117 Ad The Romans found a disunified group of tribal lands organized around the same logic of warfare as the Gauls. Most of the folks were new arrivals-the majority of southern Britain had been conquered by the Belgae from northern Gaul. In the procedure of emigrating to the island, the Celts pushed the native populations north-these refugee tribal groups would go the cultural ascendants of the Picts, a cryptic civilization that dominated Scotland until the Irish invasions. Many of the folks, peculiarly those in Wales, nevertheless, were edgy. The Romans were beset by rebellions by some Celtic folks and depredations by the northen Picts-throughout the 4th century, as the Roman imperium was strained in every one-fourth, the Romans easy lost control of Britain. The official interruption came in 446 when the Romans in response to a British supplication for aid against the Picts and the Scots, declared Britain independent.BratainAs in Gaul, the Romans brought Roman urban and military civilization ; nevertheless, other than southern England, Roman establishments and civilization were non tremendously influential on the British Celts. The Celts in the North and in Wales ferociously resisted Roman civilization, and the Romans ne'er even put pes in Ireland. On the whole, the Romans more greatly respected and tolerated Gaelic establishments and faiths in Britain, so there was well less assimilation than in Gaul. Because of this, when the Romans left Britain, there was a Renaissance of Gaelic civilization. The British, nevertheless, had learned a really of import construct from the Romans: political integrity. The most celebrated of the Celtic princes was Vortigern, who ruled over eastern Britain. In order to contend against the Pictish invasions, he sent across the channel to acquire aid from the Saxons, a Germanic folk that had begun emigrating into western Europe in the 5th century. The Saxon soldier of fortunes, nevertheless, grew in figure as more and more Saxons came to Britain. Whether or non the narrative of Vortigern is true, Britain fell prey to the same Germanic out-migrations and invasions that spread across Gaul, Spain, and Italy. The Saxon out-migration began in eastern England until they spread wholly across lowland England. The cragged countries to the West ( Wales ) and the North ( Scotland ) , nevertheless, remained Celtic, as did Ireland. By the terminal of the 5th century AD, merely Wales, Scotland, and Ireland remained of the great Celtic tribal lands that had dominated the face of Europe. It was in Ireland that Gaelic civilization and establishments lasted the longest-although Christianity was introduced at an early day of the month, Ireland did non endure any major invasions or cultural alterations until the invasions of the Norwegians and the Danish in the 8th century. The Irish besides represent the last great migration of Celtic peoples. In the 4th and 5th centuries, the Irish crossed over into Scotland and consistently invaded that district until they politically dominated the Picts who lived at that place. The subsiding of Scotland in the 5th century was the really last moving ridge of Celtic migration. For Gaelic civilization, Ireland is much like Iceland was to the Norse. It was sufficiently removed from mainstream Europe to protect it from invasions and to insulate it from many of the cultural alterations which wracked the face of early Europe. It allowed a remarkable prolongation of heathen Gaelic civilization to blend with Christian and the emerging European civilization. This alone synthesis would supply the individual most productive line of cultural transmittal between Gaelic civilization and the European civilization which grew out of classical and German beginnings. Written history in Ireland began in the 5th century when Patrick came to Ireland and introduced literacy. Patrick came to the Celtic tribal land of Tara, which was ruled by Leary, the boy of Niall No & amp ; iacute ; gallich. The boies of Niall ruled over two lands in northern Ireland ; these swayers formed a dynasty that would be called the U & A ; iacute ; N & A ; eacute ; ailment ; the South of Ireland was mostly under the control of Munster. Patrick himself confined all of his activities to northern Ireland and the U & A ; iacute ; N & A ; eacute ; sick, peculiarly around the country of Armagh. Because he introduced the Irish to Christianity, European civilization, and authorship, he became the frequenter saint of Ireland. In the 700 ‘s, Ireland became capable to Norse foraies and out-migrations, merely as most of the remainder of Europe. The first to get were the Norwegians who attacked assorted islands and some of the promontories ; in the 800 ‘s, nevertheless, the Norwegians began to assail the western seashore of Ireland. In the mid-800 ‘s and all through the 900 ‘s, the Norse actively began to construct bastioned towns along the eastern seashore of Ireland. In 841, they built the bastioned town of Dublin ( which the Irish called Ath Cliath, or, â€Å" the hurdle Ford † ) , and would subsequently set up munitions at Cork, Waterford, and Wicklow, some of the cardinal towns of ulterior Irish history. Of these towns, nevertheless, Dublin was the centre of all the Norse activity and served as their cardinal base for foraies all around Ireland and the Irish Sea. The Irish at this clip did non concentrate their population along the seashore but lived inland-the Irish besides did non populate in big and bastioned towns. The debut of both munitions and something resembling urban life was originally introduced by the Norse. Finally, nevertheless, the Norse would come in struggle with the Danish and the country around Dublin became portion of the Danish land that had been established in northern England. The Irish, nevertheless, lived in single tribal groups that were non united-it was n't until 1014 that Munster Irish under the leading of Brian B & A ; oacute ; ruma defeated the Danish at Clontarf and eventually expelled the Norse for good. The Norwegians and the Danish, nevertheless, had mostly stripped Irish civilization of its greatest cultural artefacts. The lone histories that were written of the Norse in Ireland were written by the Irish-these historiographers were far from sympathetic to the encroachers! Ireland, nevertheless, gained a cardinal displacement in its cultural and economic patterns. The Irish inherited from the Danes and Norwegians fortified coastal towns and a new economic system based on trade and commercialism with other Europeans. They besides gave to the Irish more sophisticated accomplishments in ship-building and travel.Irish republicThe most of import bequest that the Irish bequeathed to Europe was Irish Christianity. When Patrick came to Ireland in the 5th century, Christianity had spread across the face of Gaelic civilization but had n't truly penetrated the assorted Gaelic civilizations. It was dispersed really thin and practiced by a perishingly little minority in Gaul and Britain. It was besides presuming a new, distinguishable character among the Celts, who combined Christianity non merely with native Celtic establishments and faiths, but with a overplus of eastern enigma faiths. ( Much of what we call modern â€Å" pagan religion † which points to Gaelic beginnings really originates in eastern, mystery faiths that had been imported into Gaelic civilization. ) It was this Celticized version of Christianity that Patrick brought with him to Ireland. The Saxon invasions, nevertheless, wiped out Christianity in England, but non in Wales or Ireland or Scotland, where the faith had been introduced by Columba, an Irish saint. It was n't until the late 6th century that Christianity was reintroduced into Britain ; this trade name of Christianity, more aligned with the patterns of the Roman church, came into struggle with Celtic Christianity and its alone patterns. By the 10th century, the alone Celtic Christianity of Britain had mostly been subordinated to Saxon Christianity. It was in Ireland that Celtic Christianity thrived during the Germanic invasions and so the ulterior subordination of Celtic Christian patterns to Saxon patterns. The Christianity that Patrick brought to Ireland was Episcopal or diocesan Christianity-the standard signifier of Christianity in Roman occupied districts. Episcopal Christianity is oriented around the organisation of Christians as laic people under the religious and partiall secular control of a bishop ( â€Å" episcopus † in Latin ) . Episcopal Christianity, nevertheless, was entirely ill-sorted to Ireland, for it relies on a certain degree of urbanisation. For the mostly rural, disorganized, and tribal nature of early Irish society, the Episcopal construction had nil to work with. So Irish Christianity shortly developed into cloistered Christianity, which is oriented around the centralisation of a little Christian community under the leading of an archimandrite. This would go the uniquely Irish signifier of Christianity that in spirit and in pattern was much different from the preponderantly Episcopal character of Roman Christianity. The cloistered centres became the countries where Irish Christian civilization thrived-they besides introduced some political stableness and agribusiness into Irish society. While they were nominally under the authorization of Rome, because they were so removed they operated with comparative independency. This would finally convey them in terrible struggle with the Roman church. Before that, nevertheless, Irish missionaries would distribute Gaelic civilization and Christianity all over the face of Europe. Even though the Irish Christians finally submitted to Roman force per unit areas, Irish Christianity had diffused across the face of Europe. This is because the most advanced and distinguishable characteristic of Irish Christianity was rolling, called perigrinatio in Latin. While many Christians became monastics in monasteries, some became hermits, that is, lone monastics. The Irish hermits, nevertheless, saw their mission non as life in isolation, but as rolling around by themselves. These were non specifically missional rovings, but they had that consequence. In the 6th century, one of Ireland ‘s greatest saints, Columicille ( or â€Å" Columba † in Latin ) , successfully introduced Christianity to Scotland. As the in-between ages progressed, nevertheless, the unambiguously Gaelic character of the Irish church, with its profoundly superb merger of Celtic art with Christian art, its merger of Celtic societal organisation and Torahs with cloistered life, and its alone perigrinative character disappeared into the homogenising tendency of the higher center

Hume's Philosophy about reason and Passion Essay

Hume's Philosophy about reason and Passion - Essay Example Hume’s philosophy about Reason & Passion David Hume was a historian & philosopher in the mid of 18th century from Scotland. Born on May 7, 1711 & died on August 25, 1776, Hume was one of the most important philosophers of that time & is regarded with many great western philosophers of modern times. He was famous for his philosophical ideas about human empiricism & skepticism. He purposed the ideas of passion that they drive human beings rather than logical reasoning or thinking. Hence he was a contemporary of Rene Descartes, a French philosopher of 17th century, who argued that human mind is a thinking thing & it follows the logical reasoning about everything. Hume was strongly opposed to this idea of presenting human minds & he tried to establish a new & natural science about psychology of human nature. In his famous publication â€Å"A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects†, he argued that the real force which is responsible for all human activities is their desires or passions about something. Whenever anyone tends to pull towards something, it may be money or a loved one or anything else; he makes every possible chance to accomplish the goals. Reason cannot be wholly or completely the driving force, it is a part of passion or in Hume’s own words, â€Å"a slave of passions†. ... The knowledge which humans take by their experience helps them to decide what is right & what is wrong for them. In the lights of all these combined perceptions, anyone becomes able to find the right way towards success & achievements. He regarded passions as the treatment of free wills & emotions & that the moral ethics are based upon the feelings not upon the moral principles. According to him humans do not bother any kind of rules when it comes to a peculiar situation, neither they follow the logical reasoning according to the circumstances, but they follow their instincts & senses & behave accordingly. Unless the passion is not build on any false concepts, like such thing which do not have any existence, for example fear from ghosts or such things which usually don’t come in our way; it is the thing which determines what to do & what not. Hence passion can never be unreasonable since every person has his/her own logics to justify his/her passion about anything or anyone (H ume. 1739). Many scholars of that time harshly condemned this idea of Hume. They said that it is impossible not to have any kind of moral ethics or a set of rules described for the humans. In this way, any human being will do whatever he/she will want & the world will become a place where only desires are fulfilled at any cost. This also goes in the opposite way of religion since it addresses not to obey only passions but moral ethics & reasons determine one’s path to follow. They also claim the text to be very abstract & meaningless & as a combination of jumbled words. However, many scholars & philosophers of today’s time also consider his treatise a modern work in philosophy & name him as

Napoleon Bonaparte Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Napoleon Bonaparte - Research Paper Example This research paper describes life of Napoleon Bonaparte. Many historians appreciate and acknowledge Napoleon as one of the best and great men of all time. He was ruler of the French who strengthened and institutionalized a lot of restructuring of the French Revolution, that occurred during 1789 to 1799. Napoleon, even today, is considered to be one of the best military commanders of all time. This research pape is very well-structured and divided in 6 parts. The researche focuses most on describing Napoleon Bonaparte’s place in history, explores his controversial status as a hero or a villain, described Napoleon Bonaparte's years at St. Bernard and also deeply analyzed the biggest mistake in his life - the Russian Campaign. In this research paper full presentation on the Russian Campaign is given. It mentiones some important facts, such as Napoleon's confidence that he would win, the number of troops he had, war strategies that was used both by him and by Russians and his defeat. In conclusion of this research paper, author states that without the changes that Napoleon brought into effect in many countries, these nations might still be in the national devastation that they were prior to Napoleon taking over. The French revolution aroused and floated new ideas pertaining to parity, justice, liberty, and the very nature of social contact. Author concludes that the heroic efforts of Napoleon not only in battle, but also in the French society as a result of the French revolution should be remembered forever.

Managerial Accounting Practices Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 4

Managerial Accounting Practices - Essay Example Another disadvantage of fixed costs is that they eliminate flexibility and make the job of managerial accountants much harder. Variable costs change depending on the level of sales. Also a managerial accountant can find ways to eliminate or reduce variable costs easier than fixed costs. A costs structure in which variable costs are more influential than fixed costs is more likely to have a lower breakeven point. The breakeven point is the amount of sales necessary to cover all expenses. There are many fixed costs in which Claire Corporation is incurring. Some of the company’s fixed costs include building rent, salaries of administration staff, and depreciation of equipment expenses. The company’s plan of expanding the amount of distribution centers is a move that will definitely increase the company’s fixed costs. The overall sales have to increase to justify that strategic choice. If variable costs are reduce it would increase the contribution margin of the company and raise its profitability. The situation of having to liquate merchandise due to excess inventory must be remedied immediately. If the company adjust its cost structure geared towards variable costs instead of fixed costs the plan of creating a just in inventory system would bring greater benefits for the company. There are ways for the company to begin the transformation process to moving away form unnecessary fixed costs. A fixed I had not mentions that is major problem in the company is maintenance costs of the equipment. Some of these machines are obsolete and should be replaced immediately. Buying new machine would eliminate most of the wastage and unnecessary maintenance costs. I also evaluated the company debt situation. The firm has multiple long term loans that were incurred when the firm’s credit score was low due to company being a newcomer in the industry. Now our business credit rating has gone up a lot. Refinancing

Research proposal Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 3

Research Proposal Example As a perfect approach to discovery and learning, interdisciplinary approach has managed to deliver a lot and promises a greater sustainable surrounding, which is healthier and with more affluent lives. This is aligned with new forms of discoveries together with technology aimed at inspiring the young minds and getting a deeper concept regarding to our position in space, and time (Denning). The importance of using an interdisciplinary approach in tackling the issue of introducing computer programming to high school students is that the approach enables the one to draw strengths and various armory of tools brought about from various disciplines. Also the aspect of focusing on different disciplines enables an individual to broaden his or her literature foundation, hence giving rise to the original theoretical imminent. Additionally, interdisciplinary is thus, reflexive in nature (Tait, & Catherine). Computer Programming holds various disciplines including computer science. Computer science attempts to address issues dealing with natural and artificial information processes but the key effort is focused on the human made practices particularly information systems and machineries. Much knowledge regarding to the computer concerns include the digital computers and the principles that surrounds it includes, programming and computer science designing. Introducing such disciplines at high school level will put students at a better position in the global market. This discipline under computer programming will enable students have convergent cognition (Anold and Mabel). Soft ware engineering is also a discipline in computer programming subject. Hence under this discipline, students should be in apposition to understand that, keeping close the project scope is very significant in developing a product. Hence, this helps

That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded Essay - 5

That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow - Essay Example Whether in primary or middle school, the true purpose of education has lost its significance to a great extent as people seem to have forgotten that education is intrinsically linked with acquisition of knowledge. (Davidson and Carber, 2009, p.9) During the formative years, the students traverse through different stages of development and the educational programs that they are taught are not similar as that of middle schools, but one of the most significant aspects of PYP or Primary Years Program is to inculcate the idea of inquiry although it is doubtful whether the educators make genuine efforts for developing the stance of inquiry (Davidson and Carber 2009, p.11). Moreover, the teachers are concerned with the completion of curriculum that robs the children of their natural abilities of expression. For instance, if a child is unable to grasp the concept of ‘transparent’ in the classroom, a teacher may or may not prefer to take special efforts to think of a better way to solve this problem although the principles of teaching reinforce this concept. Thus, knowledge remains unfinished in most schools from early childhood and children may never learn to ask questions even during the latter years when they grow up to become adults. Knowledge, as it is known to us remains a maxim that looks good in text books and it is a fact that few people will be able to abolish when viewed in today’s perspective. The most common example that can be cited for explaining the redundancy of knowledge is that of computer education, which is now being taught in most schools and colleges. It is undoubtedly true that the world of computers, which is developing faster than a sudden storm, leave the learners in awe. Moreover, the parents are puzzled with the inclination among most children to choose computer as their chosen subject. Additionally, the computer programs and curriculums that are taught in

Summary and response Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 1

Summary and response - Assignment Example But your own argument has to identify the â€Å"they say† you are referring to make it clear to the audience (Graff & Birkenstein 43). Although we agree that you shouldn’t keep the readers in suspense for too long about your central argument, you also need to present that claim as part of some larger conversation. When responding to argumentative writing, it is often best to agree and disagree simultaneously. This allows you to avoid simple yes or no response and therefore present a more complicated argument. One can use templates to assist him in writing as they help one become more creative and original and I think it also provides a sense of direction too (Graff & Birkenstein 70). In â€Å"Her Point Is† Summarizing refers to any information from others that you present in your own words, including that which you paraphrase. It points out that a good summary requires balancing what the original author is saying with the writer’s own focus. One has to incorporate both the original author’s views and also give his or her own side of the coin. In summary writing you put yourself in someone else’s shoes send join in the conversation whether you are agreeing or disagreeing with the conversation. Just like how actors must convincingly become characters who in real life they detest. But the writer has to be cautious not to be carried away by his own influence and end changing the whole meaning and intent of the original text. In other words during summary, reflect both the source you are summarizing and add your own views (Graff & Birkenstein 115). However, the writer may decide to deliberately give his or her own spin to someone else’s argument in order to reveal a shortcoming in and this is referred to as Satirical Summary. The other may disagree or agree with the author or at times do